- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:31:00 -0400
- To: "Elliotte Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, "Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, <www-style@w3.org>, "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <public-xml-id@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-id-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-id-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Elliotte Harold > Sent: Tuesday, 26 April, 2005 12:22 > To: Robin Berjon > Cc: Ian Hickson; Henry S. Thompson; www-style@w3.org; Norman > Walsh; public-xml-id@w3.org > Subject: Re: [OT] [CSS21] xml namespace (was Re: xml:id versus xmlid) > > > Robin Berjon wrote: > > > - the 'http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace' namespace IRI > cannot be > > mapped to any prefix other than 'xml'; and > > That's a 1.1 rule. It does not appear to be a 1.0 rule. That's not quite true. See http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-names-19990114-errata#NE05 for the Erratum to NS 1.0. paul
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:31:25 UTC