- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:03:27 -0400
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org
- Message-id: <8764yb54y8.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> was heard to say: [...] | Possibly I can work around this by using some sort of | URIResolver/EntityResolver that forces everything to pass through XOM | first. I'm not sure yet. I can probably rework the test suite so that it loads the catalog with document() and accepts the real test case as its normal input. It won't generate a nice uniform report, of course. I'm content that: > I haven't yet hooked up the stylesheet, but based on my own test > harness, I think the current CVS version of XOM passes all the tests > except the one that requires 1.1. demonstrates that XOM passes the test suite, but I'm not sure how others will feel. Let me know if you'd like the reversed stylesheet harness. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Monday, 25 April 2005 14:03:41 UTC