- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:46:09 +0000
- To: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- Cc: "public-xml-er@w3.org" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
On 02/03/2012 14:36, David Lee wrote: > Suggestion: we say at an XML-ER parser produces an abstract data > model ... then its up to which one ... INFOSET ? XDM ? ... Probably > INFOSET Yes, but that has the same implication in most cases (other than DOM) that the data model you pick will have requirements on xml names. I'd rather not pick a model (for the spec) I'd just rather say that whatever you understand by "result" of "xml parse" and "xml-er" parse. then the result of an xml-er parse is equivalent to the result of an xml parse on a possibly different input document. I realise this requires some weasel words as "result" of an xml parse is not defined, but I can't help the world we live in:-) David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 14:46:40 UTC