- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:22:43 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-xml-er@w3.org Community Group" <public-xml-er@w3.org>, "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
On Mar 2, 2012, at 12:29 , Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:34:35 +0100, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: >> _If_ we are going to differ from HTML5 at this point I think I would go >> further. We have a hard requirement I think that any tree have a >> serialisation as namespace well formed XML. > > Is that really a hard requirement? As I understand it EXI goes beyond that EXI certainly goes beyond that, the XML Data Model in fact has plenty of instances that aren't serialisable to XML. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon Coming up soon: I'm teaching a W3C online course on Mobile Web Apps http://www.w3devcampus.com/writing-great-web-applications-for-mobile/
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 13:23:12 UTC