- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:09:17 +0000
- To: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-xml-er@w3.org Community Group" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
On Friday, March 2, 2012 at 12:21 PM, David Lee wrote: > I must be missing something too. > What would be a use case of XML-ER if the result is not valid XML ? > > I still suggest we start with use cases, document and agree to those before proceeding further. > Use case is clear, right? Being fault tolerant. XML-ER will give you a data structure that can then be serialized to XML 1.0… so, question is, how tolerant does it have to be or should it always produce a tree? -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 13:09:53 UTC