- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:39:22 -0500
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, public-xml-er@w3.org
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 15:12 -0500, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > I think Mark B. would be correct in his concern if we start advertising any > non-XML content as "conforming", Right. Hence my wanting something in the charter requiring that an "ER-XML processor" (whatever that is) have a way to inform users (whatever they are) that the input was not (or may not have been) conforming XML. This is also why it's Error Recovery and not XML 5. > Otherwise, I think we can leave RFC 3023 unchanged, +1 Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 20:41:40 UTC