- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:07:47 +0000
- To: public-xml-er@w3.org
On 22/02/2012 13:31, David Lee wrote: > I'm not suggesting implemters cannot choose to make an full XML > parser including API's and trees out of this. I am suggesting that > the spec not*require* it. Yes, I know, but currently I haven't seen an algorithm for fixup that doesn't parse the input, so I'm not sure how to spec a fixup process that produces a well formed XML document that doesn't first produce a tree (as in the current draft more or less) then serialise it. Is there a syntax level transformation that could be specified that goes from an xml-er document to an xml document without first building a tree and then serialising (at least conceptually, implementations may pipeline this to start serialising the result before the tree is fully built as is common in xslt). David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 14:08:18 UTC