- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:32:15 -0500
- To: W3C XML-ER Community Group <public-xml-er@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 12:32:49 UTC
I'm coming around to the view expressed by Noah and David (and others) that we'd be better off casting this as a new set of parsing rules for interpreting some sequences of characters that resemble XML but are not well-formed in a way that deterministicly produces a tree. I think when the process finishes, and we have a tree (if we have a tree), it will be possible (for a human) to look back and say, we got this tree by correcting these errors in these ways. But I'm not sure we should limit ourselves to describing the process in a way that guarantees that the XML-ER parser knows this. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 413 624 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 12:32:49 UTC