- From: Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:12:14 -0400
- To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 10:55 -0500, Paul Grosso wrote: Thought I'd sent regrets, sorry - I had some travel at short notice, and am now in London for www.libergraphics.org. Liam > > Henry pointed out that Section 4.4 references RFC 3023 > > which has been superseded by RFC 7303. The 7303 rules > > for determining encoding of XML documents are slightly > > different from the 3023 ones. > > > > Henry reviewed the consequences to the spec of changing > > 3023 to 7303 and sent email with suggested rewording at > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2016Feb/000 3 Shouldn't the respective RFC be followed for a MIME-described resource? Maybe it's OK, since in practice something like image/tiff (where a BOM isn't used) isn't going to be included successfully. > > Norm suggests that we can't force implementations to > > support [rfc 5147] and that we should clarify the spec to say > > that lack of support for fragid when parse=text > > should be a recoverable error. > > > > Henry and Paul agree with that suggestion. +1 Liam
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 17:12:20 UTC