- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:39:51 -0600
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <878uj8plfc.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes: > Norm raised an issue at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Sep/0004 > pointing out a problem copying the xml:base attribute > when the xi:xinclude element itself has an xml:base attribute. > > Norm wrote email with a couple proposals at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Nov/0006 > > We discussed this during the November 12 telcon; see minutes at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Nov/0012 > > Norm created an updated draft at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/08/xinclude-11/Overview.html > with diff (from the previously most recent draft) markup at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/08/xinclude-11/diff.html > > ACTION to all in the WG: Review the latest XInclude draft. > > ACTION to Norm, Paul, and Liam: Plan to issue a new XInclude > Last Call draft. Right. I haven't seen any (negative) comments on my draft. John, Henry, Bueller, Bueller? Assuming no one has any propsed changes, I'll try to get a pubrules clean LC draft ready with a pubdate of, oh, 2 Dec. Works for everyone? Liam, remind me what we have to do to announce going back to LC? Just email chairs? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 15:40:20 UTC