Re: On Henry's comment about documents with DOCTYPE but without markup declaration

Paul Grosso scripsit:

> where--as I said in my previous message--you claim that
> <!DOCTYPE html>
> <html/>
> is "invalid", but I believe it to be well-formed (do you disagree
> that it is well-formed?), hence my confusion about your definition of
> "invalid".

It is indeed well-formed but not valid, for it violates the Element Valid VC.

-- 
We are lost, lost.  No name, no business, no Precious, nothing.  Only empty.
Only hungry: yes, we are hungry.  A few little fishes, nassty bony little
fishes, for a poor creature, and they say death.  So wise they are; so just,
so very just.  --Gollum        cowan@ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan

Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 15:51:54 UTC