- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:41:46 -0600
- To: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <530773BA.4020404@paulgrosso.name>
Follow up from commentor. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: WFC: Parsed Entity Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:14:23 +0000 Resent-From: xml-editor@w3.org Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 00:13:50 +1100 From: SJ Kissane <skissane@gmail.com> To: xml-editor@w3.org Please ignore my email; I just read section 5.2 and now realize why I am wrong. On 21 February 2014 23:52, SJ Kissane <skissane@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I suggest that "WFC: Parsed Entity" in section 4.1 be split into a VC > and WFC. Suppose an unparsed entity is declared in the external DTD of > the document; use of that entity in the document would make it > invalid, but it cannot make it non-well-formed, since well-formedness > must be decidable without reading the external DTD. So "WFC: Parsed > Entity" should only apply to references to unparsed entities declared > to be as such in the internal DTD subset, not to unparsed entities > declared in the external DTD or in external parameter entities > referenced in the internal DTD subset; a separate VC should be defined > to apply to references to unparsed entities declared in external DTD > or external parameter entities referenced in the internal DTD subset. > > Do you agree? > > Regards > Simon Kissane
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 15:42:11 UTC