- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:57:38 -0400
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: liam@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Jirka Kosek scripsit:
> In general it would be a lot of paperwork and boring editorial work. If
> it will be successful, users will be able to buy useless PDF rendering
> of XML Schema spec from ISO in two years. I don't think it is worth
> effort. And in general there are many existing precedents where
> publishing one specification by two standardization bodies introduced
> maintenance issues.
+1 on all points.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Any sufficiently-complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad-hoc,
informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
--Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming (rules 1-9 are unknown)
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 22:58:00 UTC