- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:37:13 -0500
- To: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>
- CC: timbl@w3.org, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, chairs@w3.org, webreq@w3.org, w3t-comm@w3.org
What's [1], what's [2], and what's wrong with what's at http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/09/xinclude-11/ other than it's not at http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/ which is where it is destined to go 9and where I said it should be put) but where I don't have permission to put it? paul On 2013-10-03 17:37, Jérémie Astori wrote: > Hi, > > This URL [1] points to the latest version actually in place at the > moment, while this URL [2] currently links to a 404. Could you tell me > where I can find the document to validate, please? > > Thanks, > > Jérémie > > On 03/10/13 12:37, Paul Grosso wrote: >> >> >> The XML Core WG requests transition of >> XML Inclusions (XInclude) Version 1.1 >> currently staged at >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/09/xinclude-11/ >> to a Candidate Recommendation. >> >> The URL cited above is for the most recent draft >> version of the draft as of 2 October 2013, designed to >> be published on October 8 by having the directory >> moved over to >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/ >> in its entirety. We believe it satisfies all relevant >> pubrules. >> >> A version with color-coded revision indicators comparing this >> draft to the XInclude 1.1 Last Call draft is available at >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/09/xinclude-11/diff.html >> >> A version with color-coded revision indicators comparing this >> draft to the XInclude 1.0 Recommendation is available at >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/09/xinclude-11/diff10.html >> >> The Last Call version of this document is at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-xinclude-11-20130115/ >> The Last Call period ended 22 February 2013. This CR draft >> reflects changes due to the Last Call comments, none of >> which were substantive; all the resolutions of those comments >> were accepted by the commentors as noted in the Disposition of >> Comments document at >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/05/xinclude-11-lc-doc/ >> >> The associated requirements document is >> XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases >> at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-xinclude-11-requirements-20120214/ >> >> The WG's decision to request transition to CR was taken >> during a WG telcon on October 2 whose minutes may be found at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Oct/0008 >> >> >> SCHEDULE >> >> We propose a publication date of 8 October 2013 (if we can >> get the transition approved in time). >> >> >> PROPOSED TITLE, ABSTRACT AND STATUS SECTIONS >> >> XML Inclusions (XInclude) Version 1.1 >> >> Abstract >> -------- >> This document specifies a processing model and syntax for general >> purpose inclusion. Inclusion is accomplished by merging a number >> of XML information sets into a single composite infoset. >> Specification of the XML documents (infosets) to be merged and >> control over the merging process is expressed in XML-friendly >> syntax (elements, attributes, URI references). >> >> Status of this Document >> ----------------------- >> This section describes the status of this document at the time of its >> publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of >> current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical >> report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/. >> >> This is a Candidate Recommendation of XInclude 1.1 for review by >> W3C Members and other interested parties. The Last Call period >> ended 22 February 2013. This draft reflects changes due to the >> Last Call comments, none of which were substantive; all the >> resolutions of those comments were accepted by the commentors >> as noted in the Disposition of Comments document. >> >> XInclude 1.1 adds some upward-compatible enhancements to the >> XInclude 1.0 Recommendation as discussed in the XInclude 1.1 >> Requirement and Use Cases document. The three key enhancements >> can be summarized as follows: >> >> * added support for a fragment identifier into text/plain content, >> >> * additional processing to allow for “annotating” the post-included >> infoset with further information, and >> >> * allow implementations the flexibility to support additional |parse| >> values. >> >> This document has been produced by the W3C XML Core Working Group >> <http://www.w3.org/XML/Core/> as >> part of the XML Activity <http://www.w3.org/XML/Activity>. The Working >> Group expects to advance this >> Candidate Recommendation to Recommendation Status. We expect to exit >> the CR period with at least two interoperable implementations of all >> the features being added as part of XInclude 1.1. We will not exit >> CR before 8 November 2013 by which time we do expect to have sufficient >> implementation experience. >> >> Please send comments about this document to the public >> www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org mailing list; archives are available. >> >> Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement by >> the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, >> replaced >> or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite >> this document as other than work in progress. >> >> Known implementations are documented in the XInclude Implementation >> Report at http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/10/xinclude-11-impl-report/. A >> Test Suite is maintained at >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/10/xinclude-11-test-suite/ >> to help in assessing conformance to this specification. The latest >> release >> of the Test Suite includes new test cases which implementers can use >> to check their conformance to the changes included in this new edition. >> >> This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February >> 2004 >> W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures >> made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also >> includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has >> actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains >> Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with >> section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. >> >> Paul Grosso and Norman Walsh, chairs of the XML Core WG. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 23:37:43 UTC