- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:36:22 -0600
- To: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
That works for me. paul > On Nov 28, 2013, at 9:27, ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) wrote: > > Paul Grosso writes: > >>> Appendix B lists the core XML specifications which, taken together >>> with [XML] itself, show how to determine an XML document's semantics >>> at both the language level and the application level. >> >> My concern here is that the above sentence appears to say >> that the given list of specifications is sufficient to >> determine all the document's application level semantics, >> and that is not true. No list can determine all the >> application level semantics for all applications (including >> applications not yet envisioned). >> >> I'd like to see a rewording that makes it clear that we >> aren't suggesting either that the given list is exhaustive >> or that any list could be exhaustive in determining all >> application level semantics. > > Good point, and I had meant to avoid that, but obviously failed to do > so. > > How about > > Appendix B lists the core XML specifications which, taken together > with [XML] itself, show how to determine an XML document's > language-level semantics and suggest how information about its > application level semantics may be locatable. > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh > 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 15:37:00 UTC