Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2013 November 13

Attendees
---------
Norm
Henry
Paul
John

[4 organizations (6 with proxies) present out of 10]

Regrets
-------
Loren
David
Daniel, proxy to the chair
Mohamed, proxy to the chair


Absent organizations
--------------------
Innovimax (with regrets, proxy to the chair)
Red Hat (with regrets, proxy to the chair)
Univ of Econ, Prague
W3C
Greatlinkup (with regrets)
NACS (with regrets)


Our next telcon is November 27.


> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>   the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>   or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
>

Accepted

>
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
>
> Submitting XML Schema 1.1 to ISO
> --------------------------------
> Liam raised the question of whether the W3C should submit
> XML Schema 1.1 as an ISO standard; some discussion ensued:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Oct/thread#msg28
> and we had more discussion on our last two telcons.
>
> ACTION to David and Loren: Discuss the issues with taking
> XML Schema (1.0 and 1.1) to ISO and recommend a path.

ACTION to David and Loren continued.


>
>
> 3.  XML Test Suite.
>
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
>
>
> 4. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
>
> We have planned to issue the following spec editions referencing
> LEIRIs (and any outstanding errata):
>
> * XML 1.0 6th Edition (John to be editor)
> * XML 1.1 3rd Edition (John to be editor)
> * XInclude 3rd Edition (Paul to be editor)
>
> but all this is on hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis.
>
>
> 5.  XML Media types (3023bis)
>
> The latest (diff marked) draft (dated November 4, 2013 ) is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-04_diff.html
>
> Comments and resolutions at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/02-comments.html
>
> Please note in particular that a significant addition has been made to
> section 3.6 [1], to address the fact that the XML spec. itself defers
> to this spec. to define the precedence of charset parameter [in the
> http header], BOM and XML encoding declaration [both in the document].
>
> ACTION to John:  Review the latest 3023-bis draft.
>

John reviewed it and had no comments.

ACTION to Paul:  Draft a message to IETF endorsing 3023-bis -04
be transitioned to an RFC.  Address it to Murray Kucherawy
<superuser@gmail.com>, cc-ing apps-discuss@ietf.org.


> In related email, John did comment on Henry's "who's on top":
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Nov/0005
>
>
> 6.  XInclude 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
>
> On 2012 February 14, we published
> XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/
>
> On 9 October 2012, we published our FPWD of XInclude 1.1 at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/WD-xinclude-11-20121009/
>
> On 15 January 2013, we published our (first) Last Call of
> XInclude 1.1 at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-xinclude-11-20130115/
> and Paul sent the transition announcement at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Jan/0012
> (also cc-ing the chairs mailing list).
> On 2013 October 8, we published the XInclude 1.1 CR at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/
>
> Norm reports that Michael Kay's code just accesses Xerces code,
> so Norm might have to work with Xerces.
>
> DV reports that he is busy and so cannot commit to a deadline
> for adding XInclude 1.1 support to libxml.
>
> ACTION to Norm:  Continue to work toward getting XInclude 1.1
> implementations and document them in our implementation report.


ACTION to Norm continued.


>
> 7. MicroXML
>
> MicroXML is not in our new charter, but we can discuss it.
> We will leave this as an ongoing item in our standing agenda.
>
>
> paul
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Oct/0008
>
>