- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:38:41 -0600
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2k3q1qzpq.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes:
> Something you said below confuses me.
>
> Under 2, you say "The content of that element is a single
> text node containing a single character", but then under 3,
> you say "There's nothing that isn't Unicode normalized
> about that sequence [of] 27 characters."
>
> But "27 characters" implies "̸" is 8 characters,
> not "a single text node containing a single character".
>
> Can you unravel my confusion?
The question in 3 is how should applications *produce* "fully
normalized" XML 1.0 or 1.1. My point about 27 characters is that I
believe an application that chose to serialize the single combining
solidus character as a numeric character reference would be producing
fully normalized Unicode. Unicode doesn't care about the XML infoset,
it only cares about sequences of octets.
Unraveled?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 18:39:12 UTC