- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:38:41 -0600
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2k3q1qzpq.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes: > Something you said below confuses me. > > Under 2, you say "The content of that element is a single > text node containing a single character", but then under 3, > you say "There's nothing that isn't Unicode normalized > about that sequence [of] 27 characters." > > But "27 characters" implies "̸" is 8 characters, > not "a single text node containing a single character". > > Can you unravel my confusion? The question in 3 is how should applications *produce* "fully normalized" XML 1.0 or 1.1. My point about 27 characters is that I believe an application that chose to serialize the single combining solidus character as a numeric character reference would be producing fully normalized Unicode. Unicode doesn't care about the XML infoset, it only cares about sequences of octets. Unraveled? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 18:39:12 UTC