- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:34:56 -0600
- To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
On 6 Feb 2013, at 10:54 AM, Paul Grosso wrote: > The XML Core WG has no objections to the Team implementing > the edits-in-place to > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/Overview.html > and > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/REC-xml-20081126.xml > to correct the obsolete link issues wrt BCP47/RFC 4646/RFC 4647. > > [If someone wants to make parallel changes to XML 1.1 2nd Ed, > that's fine too.] > > Once those changes have been published, I will update > the XML 1.0 5th Ed Errata at > http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-5e-errata > to reflect those changes (and this will ensure these > changes will make it into any future edition). Thanks, Paul. Liam, can you give your ok to the Webmaster then? Ian > > paul > > On 2013-02-04 13:16, Ian Jacobs wrote: >> On 4 Feb 2013, at 10:34 AM, Paul Grosso wrote: >> >>> On 2013-02-04 10:02, Ian Jacobs wrote: >>>> On 4 Feb 2013, at 9:56 AM, Paul Grosso wrote: >>>> >>>>> I will confirm on this week's telcon, but I have no objections >>>>> in principle if the team wants to make these changes. >>>>> >>>>> I would be curious to see Ian's reference [2] which I cannot >>>>> because it is team-only. While it isn't necessary, if either >>>>> a copy of that message or at least a brief summary of what it >>>>> says could be made available, I'd appreciate it. >>>> There's nothing useful there. It was just a record of my having asked isi.edu to >>>> put in place the redirect and their response that "Our ftp server can not handle redirects." >>>> >>>>> As far as making the actual changes, someone needs to decide >>>>> if the changes (and "modified in place" notice) should be made >>>>> only in the Overview.html or also in REC-xml-20081126-review.html >>>>> and REC-xml-20081126.xml. >>>> Good catch. I think useful in the .xml file. What's the -review file? >>> XHTML with color-coded revision indicators. >> (I suggest not updating that one.) >> >> Ian >> >>> paul >>> >>> >>>> Ian >>>> >>>>> I will augment xml-V10-5e-errata.html to include this modification >>>>> which will ensure we consider this change when generating the next >>>>> edition. >>>>> >>>>> paul >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2013-02-03 11:47, Liam R E Quin wrote: >>>>>> I think this is sensible and we should just go ahead and do it: it's not >>>>>> substantive and the process allows us to fix broken links. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any objections if the Team does the suggested change? It should also be >>>>>> reflected in the CVS version... >>>>>> >>>>>> Liam >>>>>> >>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>>>>> From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> >>>>>> To: [...] >>>>>> Cc: [...] >>>>>> Subject: Request for in-place modification of XML 1.0 5E >>>>>> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:11:38 -0600 >>>>>> >>>>>> Denis, Liam, >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim Bray, co-editor of Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition) [1] forwarded this message to me: >>>>>> >>>>>> === >>>>>>> While viewing the XML recommendation at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/ I noticed the link to BCP 47 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#RFC1766) is broken, it gives a 550 Directory Not Found. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can this be fixed/changed to http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47? >>>>>> === >>>>>> >>>>>> The broken URI is: >>>>>> ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt >>>>>> >>>>>> I contacted the people who manage isi.edu to ask them to restore it or create a redirect. They replied that they could not [2]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Therefore, per [3] I am requested an in-place modification to XML 1.0 5E to update the link. It turns out we need to replace >>>>>> a single link with two: >>>>>> >>>>>> * Please link "RFC 4646: Tags for Identifying Languages" to >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4646 >>>>>> >>>>>> * And "RFC 4647: Matching of Language Tags" to: >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4647 >>>>>> >>>>>> <p><strong>Note:</strong> On @@date@@ this specification was modified in place to replace broken links to RFC4646 and RFC4647.</p> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ian >>>>>> >>>>>> P.S. RFC4646 has been obsoleted, but we should not update the reference in XML 1.0 5E. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/ >>>>>> [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/w3t-archive/2013Feb/0000.html >>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/republishing/ >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ >>>>>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ >>>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ >> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >> >> >> > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:35:14 UTC