- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:26:08 -0600
- To: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52B27560.5000303@paulgrosso.name>
For those not on xml-editors (message 2 of 2).
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Errata: Entities cannnot begin with a BOM - can only be
preceded by a BOM
Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 02:21:33 +0000
Resent-From: xml-editor@w3.org
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 03:21:03 +0100
From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Organization: Målform.no
To: xml-editor@w3.org
Section 4.3.3. of XML 1.0 fifth edition contains the following phrase,
which sounds as though an entity (for example an external entity) may
begin with a Byte Order Mark:
“an entity which begins with neither a Byte Order Mark
nor an encoding declaration”
While it is not 100% clear what kind of ”entity” it is meant, the
phrase is misleading because, as pointed out in the same section, and
in the document production in section 2[2][3], and as re-emphasized by
3023bis (XML media types)[4], the BOM (unlike an encoding declaration)
is not part of the external entity.
So an entity cannot “begin” with a BOM, it can only be preceded by a
BOM. (By analogy, when there is a transport protocol, such as HTTP, we
do not say the entity “begins”
with a Content-Type declaration.)
Hence, please update the above phrase to reflect this point, for
instance by adjusting it roughly like this:
“an entity which is neither preceded by a Byte Order Mark nor begins
with an encoding declaration”
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#charencoding
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#dt-xml-doc
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-document
[4]
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-06#section-3.3
--
leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 04:26:37 UTC