- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:18:16 +0800
- To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-xml-core-wg <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:02:54PM -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 10:44 +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > [...] People who want
> > > in-browser XSLT rendering should be using Saxon-CE anyway.
> >
> > Urgh ... at least libxslt can be embbeded in the browser code,
> > now if you expect people are gonna allow Java extensions to be able
> > to run XSLT based pages, I think you are wrong,
>
> pssst... SaxonCE is in JavaScript.
well I wasn't sure so before replying I tried to check and went to:
https://github.com/Saxonica/Saxon-CE/tree/master/src/client
Saxonce.java
Javascript usually uses .js suffix, right ?
If it is actually all written in javascript that's nice !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 04:19:07 UTC