- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:02:00 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Robin Berjon writes:
> On 14/09/2012 10:30 , Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> See
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-04
>>
>> This registers +suffixes for several binary xml formats, and includes
>> text about fragment identifier interpretation precedence.
>
> Is anyone still creating new content using WBXML or Fast Infoset? (Or
> ASN.1 for that matter.) If not, I wonder if it wouldn't be more
> sensible to just flag those suffixes as historical and just move on.
I _think_ the intention here is just to get existing
used-but-not-registered suffixes registered, without prejudice to
their expected subsequent use.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 09:02:30 UTC