- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:56:23 -0500
- To: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <504DF187.1010303@paulgrosso.name>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be September 19. Norm sends regrets. Status and open actions ======================= Charter renewal, need to rejoin ------------------------------- The new XML Core WG charter has been approved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2012JulSep/0033 The call for participation has gone out and all WG members must have their AC rep rejoin the WG per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2012JulSep/0034 The following membership issues appear (to me, I could be wrong) outstanding: 1. IBM has not yet rejoined. 2. Innovimax has rejoined but not nominated anyone. 3. MarkLogic has rejoined but not nominated anyone. 4. Red Hat has rejoined but not nominated anyone. When I go to the page that is supposed to be the XML Core data base at https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=18796 there are clearly a lot of people who are not really members, so ones appearance on this page proves nothing. ACTIONs to Liam: (1) Clear out all the entries from https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=18796 except the nine of us listed at https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#membership. (2) Let us know which of the nine organizations still need to rejoin the working group. (3) Let us know which of the nine organization still need to nominate a person. Error Recovery Note ------------------- Liam raised an issue about a note about error recovery at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Sep/0002 Neither Paul nor Norm thought creating such a note was going to be particularly useful, and Paul wondered why the XML Core WG should write a note about something that is not XML, but we decided we would pick this up when Liam and others can be on the call. Fall TPAC --------- There will be a TPAC meeting in Lyon, France in October/November: http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/Overview.html We have signed up to have a WG f2f there. Likely to attend: Norm, Liam, Henry, Jirka, Mohamed Not likely to attend: Glenn, Paul, John, Daniel xml-stylesheet and HTML5 ------------------------ Hnery took an action to file a bug about xml-stylesheet handling. Done: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14689 Henry has done a lot more testing and filing of results to date. Henry's tests are at http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/11/ssTests/ You need to look at the README and README2 files there. The CSS2 spec says something about styling XML with CSS. Henry also notes http://www.w3.org/Style/styling-XML.en.html. Henry has filed bugs against the HTML5 spec saying that it should support styling XML with CSS. Currently, there are: [Bug 17976] New: xml-stylesheet with type=text/xsl needs to be handled explicitly and [Bug 14689] xml-stylesheet with type=text/xsl needs to be handled explicitly A lot of bugzilla email has been exchanged on this issue. It looks like we have agreement to address it, but only in HTML.next. XInclude 1.1 ------------ On 2012 February 14, we published XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ Norm created a first draft XInclude 1.1 which is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/08/xinclude-11/diff.html Paul, Norm, Jirka, and John have reviewed and have no comments (other than the items listed "TO DO"). ACTION to Henry, Glenn, Daniel, Mohamed, Liam: Review and comment on the XInclude 1.1 draft. Paul thinks we should publish an FPWD for XInclude 1.1 by mid-October so that it will have been out before TPAC. That gives us Sept 19 and Oct 3 telcons, and it would be best to be able to approve the FPWD for publication on our Oct 3 telcon so that I can request publication around October 9. Note that the XInclude errata at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/11/xinclude-errata/ lists one simple erratum that we will want to incorporate into XInclude 1.1. ACTION to Norm: Add some examples, change "resource error" to "recoverable error", implement the above mentioned erratum, and make a general sanity check pass on the XInclude 1.1 draft. ACTION to Paul: Propose SOTD wording for a FPWD.
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 13:57:07 UTC