- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:18:11 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Looks shippable to me. paul On 2012-10-10 11:07, Norman Walsh wrote: > ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes: >> This looks good to me. You might also want to add a pointer to >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Sep/0041.html >> >> which gives evidence that ~10% of XML in the University of Amsterdam >> XML on the Web Corpus contains <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' ...?> > The XML Core Working Group objects to the decision to mark > discussion of the XML stylesheet PI with type='text/xsl' as either > "RESOLVED LATER" or "HTML.next". > > The stylesheet PI is widely supported and has been in use for a long > time. It is an important part of the browser API. Some test cases[1] > for the XML stylesheet PI with type='text/xsl' have been attached to > the bug report[2]. > > In a sampling of the University of Amsterdam XML Web Collection, > more than 10% of the documents[3] have an XML stylesheet PI with > type='text/xsl'. > > The XML Core WG remains concerned that the absence of a mention > of support for the XML stylesheet PI with type='text/xsl' would > serve to discourage users from taking advantage of the existing > functionality and might set implementers on a path towards > deprecating the feature. > > The XML Core WG feels strongly that some mention of support > for the XML stylesheet PI with type='text/xsl' or > type='application/xslt+xml' needs to be included in the > initial HTML5 Recommendation. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/11/ssTests/ > [2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1046 > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Sep/0041.html > > Any other comments, or should I ship it? > > Be seeing you, > norm >
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 16:18:36 UTC