- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 22:20:30 +0800
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:48:40PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:31:40AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: [...] > > I can totally sign up for saying that parse must be "xml", "text" or a > > MIME content type. > > I would love that too. It just raise some extra work: > - change the production for the attribute value (reference to > an adequate RFC or internal new productions) > - clarification of unadequate value for parse still being a > fatal error. > - proper references added (is that IETF or IANA I can't remember) > - maybe close a potential loophole stating that text/plain > is equivalent to text and the XML mimetypes are equivalent to > "xml" > > I'm sorry, I'm on vacation, on an island, the power actually went off > and I'm running out of battery, and the call is at 11:30pm ... I may > miss the call, sorry about that, as I really want to get back to an > active status on the group ! BTW If I miss the call which looks more and more likely, proxy to the chair as usual, and I'm not opposed to publish a WD even if the above would be IMHO an improvement. I will let Norm decide what is best in the situation :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 14:21:05 UTC