- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:05:23 -0500
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 13:30 +0100, Jirka Kosek wrote: > Unfortunatelly during the HTML WG meeting where our request was > discussed no clear outcome was reached due (IMHO) unproductive chairing > of meeting at that time. Robin aftrwards explained to me that the HTML WG has a policy of making decisions only on their mailing list, not at meetings. > > However given the number of other places where XSLT and its interaction > with HTML is mentioned I think that I can live with the status quo for > now as Norm is proposing. Of course we should cooperate with HTML WG and > provide some tests requested in bugreport, so next version of HTML can > contain much more precise definition of XSLT interaction together with > JS APIs for XSLT etc. +1, I'm uneasy but can live with what's there for now - XSLT is in any case not going away because of commitment to existing content. Agree more precise spec very important long term. We (Core + XSL + HTML?) should standardise e.g. calling XSLT on a DOM fragment and passing parameters from JavaScript in an HTML document. (can't run JavaScript in an XML document as there's no xml:script of course) -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:06:52 UTC