Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2012 November 14

Paul Grosso scripsit:

> >MicroXML
> >--------
> >This is the W3C Community Group work on a subset of XML. See
> >http://www.w3.org/community/microxml/
> >and
> >http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/microxml/raw-file/tip/spec/microxml.html
> >
> >Henry says that if they do decide to standardize it, we
> >should do it.  We do own that name.  Meanwhile, we will
> >wait and see what the Community Group produces.
> 
> ACTION to John:  Ask the Comm Group what they want to do
> with this spec.

Done at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-microxml/2012Nov/0000.html>.
Note that this version asks for objections (silence presumes consent).
David Lee has given his explicit approval in .../0001.html.

-- 
John Cowan    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan   <cowan@ccil.org>
    "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context.  A telegram
    that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
    5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
    as any, even sans digital signature." --me

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:25:30 UTC