- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:58:45 -0600
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
What happened is that the xmlspec.xsl I was using doesn't handle the @diff attribute on the phrase element. (In fact, I don't think it handles the @diff='del' case properly on any of the elements.) I looked at the xmlspec.xsl being using by the latest XInclude spec, and it was basically the same one as I was using, so it appears that we've never be handling @diff='del' properly when generating the non-diff version of the spec. Is this possible? I added a template to xmlspec.xsl to toss elements with @diff='del'. Now I'll have to check with W3C staff to see what it might take to fix things on the TR page. paul On 2012-11-05 08:45, Jirka Kosek wrote: > On 4.10.2012 0:01, Paul Grosso wrote: >> The XML Core WG requests publication of >> >> Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0 (Third Edition) >> >> available at >> >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/xml-model/ >> >> as the third edition of a Working Group Note. > Hi Paul, > > it seems that something got screwed during the publication process. > > If you look at: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-xml-model-20121009/ > > you will see that not all edits shown in diff are applied here: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-xml-model-20121009/xml-model-diff.htm > > Namely edits made in the paragraph (in 2nd edition): > > "However, this specification is being jointly developed by the W3C and > ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34. The technical content of this specification and that > of ISO/IEC 19757-11 is expected to be identical, so the basic content of > this WG Note may be—or may become—referenceable in another form." > > were not applied. Other edits seems to be applied correctly. > > Jirka >
Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 15:59:16 UTC