- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:29:23 -0500
- To: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be 2012 March 21. Status and open actions ======================= xml-stylesheet and HTML5 ------------------------ Hnery took an action to file a bug about xml-stylesheet handling. Done: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14689 Henry has done a lot more testing and filing of results to date. Henry's tests are at http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/11/ssTests/ You need to look at the README and README2 files there. The CSS2 spec says something about styling XML with CSS. Henry also notes http://www.w3.org/Style/styling-XML.en.html. ACTION to Henry: File a bug against the HTML5 spec saying that it should support styling XML with CSS. issues with the Polyglot draft: BOM ------------------------------------ Henry sent email with various potential issues at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Nov/0037 We discussed the point about the spec recommending [P1] the use of the UTF-8 BOM. [P1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/#character-encoding Henry thinks we converged on this in email on Wednesday 11 January: See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Jan/0007 ACTION: Henry to file an issue against Polyglot about the BOM. issues with the Polyglot draft: xml:space and xml:base ------------------------------------------------------- See the minutes at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Jan/0016 for the discussion. ACTION: Henry to draft an issue regarding xml:space and xml:base in the Polyglot draft for WG review. XInclude 1.1 ------------ On 2012 February 14, we published XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ summarizing the requirements and use cases for possible enhancements to XInclude addressing the issues: * @xpointer when parse="text" * copying attributes from the xinclude element to the root included element Before producing an XInclude 1.1, we will need an amended charter as indicated by Ian at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Dec/0014 We will wait to see what if any feedback we get from the published requirements and use cases and then, if we want to go ahead with an XInclude 1.1, we should look into amending our charter. Norm has posted something to the DocBook TC: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/201202/msg00001.html and at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/201202/msg00002.html was a follow up posting that (I believe) requested that we also augment XInclude to allow for including the *contents* of all the elements addressed by the xpointer attribute, but not the elements themselves. ACTION to Norm: Continue to publicize the XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases WG Note to potentially interested parties and see if you can drum up any feedback.
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 14:29:53 UTC