- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:33:57 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2haufxm3e.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> writes:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 08:26 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
>
>> a. xpointer, despite the fact that XPointer is specifically about XML
>> b. textpointer, as a parallel to xpointer
>> c. fragid, deprecating xpointer
> or, fragment-identifier, or loc, minor detail, all equiv. to (c)
Yeah, I didn't think we needed more choices :-)
>> 2. What attributes should be copied from the XInclude element to the
>> root(s) of the included content?
>>
>> a. all of them
>> b. all except href, parse, xml:base, and xml:lang
>> c. only namespace qualified attributes
>> d. only non-namespace-qualified attributes
>> e. the attributes to be copied could be explicitly enumerated in a new attribute
>
> In the interests of simplicity, suggest
> f. all atts not associated with the XInclude namespace
> (this is close to b but works in documents not otherwise using
> namespaces)
I think that's the same as b. Or the what I meant by b anyway.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 15:34:31 UTC