- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:33:57 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2haufxm3e.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> writes: > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 08:26 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > >> a. xpointer, despite the fact that XPointer is specifically about XML >> b. textpointer, as a parallel to xpointer >> c. fragid, deprecating xpointer > or, fragment-identifier, or loc, minor detail, all equiv. to (c) Yeah, I didn't think we needed more choices :-) >> 2. What attributes should be copied from the XInclude element to the >> root(s) of the included content? >> >> a. all of them >> b. all except href, parse, xml:base, and xml:lang >> c. only namespace qualified attributes >> d. only non-namespace-qualified attributes >> e. the attributes to be copied could be explicitly enumerated in a new attribute > > In the interests of simplicity, suggest > f. all atts not associated with the XInclude namespace > (this is close to b but works in documents not otherwise using > namespaces) I think that's the same as b. Or the what I meant by b anyway. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 413 624 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 15:34:31 UTC