- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:51:28 +0200
- To: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- CC: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>, core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4FD870B0.6010409@kosek.cz>
Hi, same with me. Jirka On 12.6.2012 14:21, Innovimax W3C wrote: > Dear all, > > Please accept my regrets > > My proxy to the chair > > Best regards, > > Mohamed > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> wrote: > >> We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, >> June 13, from >> 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka >> 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka >> 15:30-16:00 UTC >> 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK >> 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe >> on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. >> We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . >> >> See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents >> and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please >> email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. >> >> Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and >> completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it >> at the beginning of the call. >> >> >> Regrets from Henry. >> >> >> Agenda >> ====== >> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and >> the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, >> or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). >> >> >> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. >> >> XML Core WG Charter >> ------------------- >> The amended XML Core WG charter that allows us to work on >> XInclude 1.1 is currently out for AC review. Please get >> your AC rep to complete the review. The call for review is at >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2012AprJun/0059 >> >> >> Fall TPAC >> --------- >> There will be a TPAC meeting in Lyon, France in October/November: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Mar/0006 >> >> We have signed up to have a WG f2f there. >> >> Likely to attend: Norm, Liam, Henry, Jirka, Mohamed >> Not likely to attend: Glenn, Paul, John, Daniel >> >> >> xml-stylesheet and HTML5 >> ------------------------ >> Henry took an action to file a bug about xml-stylesheet >> handling. Done: >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14689 >> >> Henry has done a lot more testing and filing of results to date. >> Henry's tests are at >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/11/ssTests/ >> You need to look at the README and README2 files there. >> >> The CSS2 spec says something about styling XML with CSS. >> Henry also notes http://www.w3.org/Style/styling-XML.en.html. >> >> ACTION to Henry: File a bug against the HTML5 spec saying that >> it should support styling XML with CSS. >> >> >> issues with the Polyglot draft >> ------------------------------ >> Henry sent email with various potential issues at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Nov/0037 >> >> Polyglot draft: BOM >> ------------------- >> We discussed the point about the spec recommending [P1] the use of the >> UTF-8 BOM. >> >> [P1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/#character-encoding >> >> Henry filed an issue against Polyglot about the BOM: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012May/0000 >> >> Someone pushed back saying that the BOM is more robust than >> the meta as a way of signaling UTF-8, so we shouldn't make >> meta the preferred way of doing it. The proposed compromise >> is that neither would be listed as preferred. >> >> We're okay with that compromise. >> >> ACTION to Henry: Accept the compromise. >> >> >> Polyglot draft: xml:space and xml:base >> -------------------------------------- >> See the minutes at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Jan/0016 >> for the discussion. >> >> Henry has drafted two issues regarding xml:space and xml:base in >> the Polyglot draft and HTML5 for WG review; see >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012May/0001 >> >> Norm thinks Henry's draft is fine. Let's submit it and >> see what happens. >> >> ACTION to Henry: Submit his comments on xml:space and xml:base. >> >> >> 3. XML Test Suite. >> >> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite >> >> ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite >> issues raised by Frans Englich: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ >> >> >> 4. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri >> >> We have planned to issue the following spec editions referencing >> LEIRIs (and any outstanding errata): >> >> * XML 1.0 6th Edition (John to be editor) >> * XML 1.1 3rd Edition (John to be editor) >> * XInclude 3rd Edition (Paul to be editor) >> >> but all this is on hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. >> >> >> 5. XInclude 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude >> >> On 2012 February 14, we published >> XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ >> summarizing the requirements and use cases for possible >> enhancements to XInclude addressing the issues: >> >> * @xpointer when parse="text" >> * copying attributes from the xinclude element to the root >> included element >> >> We did get mostly positive feedback from Chris Lilley at: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/2012Feb/0000 >> >> Norm has posted something to the DocBook TC: >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/201202/msg00001.html >> >> Norm nudged the DocBook mailing list again >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/201204/msg00000.html >> and did publish this a few weeks ago: >> http://norman.walsh.name/2012/02/20/xinclude11 >> >> Jirka gave some more feedback at >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/201204/msg00002.html >> and also included it at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Apr/0002 >> >> Daniel raised a concern about there possibly not being a root >> included element at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Apr/0010 >> and Jirka responded at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Apr/0011 >> We will need to consider this issue when we draft the spec. >> >> An updated charter is being reviewed by the AC. >> We don't expect any pushback, but in practice it will >> probably take a couple months before we really have a >> new charter. >> >> Meanwhile we could work on an XInclude 1.1 draft, but >> we couldn't publish it until we have our new charter. >> >> Norm is willing to continue to be editor of XInclude 1.1. >> >> We will start working on a draft over the next couple months >> by which time we should have a new charter and be able to >> publish. >> >> ACTION to Norm: Send out emails on the key XInclude 1.1 issues. >> >> >> 6. XML Model >> >> Jirka reminded us that ISO published XML Model as an international >> standard. One can buy it at >> >> http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=54793 >> >> He said that the process is in order to try to allow the ISO version >> to be published for free. >> >> We will wait to see if it becomes freely available and then update >> our note to reference it. >> >> Jirka reported that the ISO process for making the ISO version >> free is a bit involved. WG1 has to recommend to SC34 that the >> spec be made public. This should happen at a June 2012 meeting. >> Then there is a 60 day ballot in SC34, then there is a 60 day >> ballot at the JTC1 level. If all goes well, ISO/IEC 19757-11 >> could be published at the ITTF page in late 2012. >> >> So it doesn't look like we'd be updating our XML Model WG Note >> before 2013. >> >> >> paul >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core >> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks >> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012May/0018 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 10:51:57 UTC