- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:54:41 -0600
- To: liam@w3.org
- CC: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On 2012-02-09 14:44, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 11:34 -0600, Paul Grosso wrote: >> The XML Core WG requests transition of >> >> XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases >> >> currently staged at >> >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/01/xinclude-11-requirements/staging/2012-02/ > > The status section is missing its "unique sentence" to describe why the > document is being published - e.g. see > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20120103/ > > A more minimal example: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xproc-requirements-20060411/ I don't understand. Which sentence in http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xproc-requirements-20060411/ is the "unique sentence" to which you refer? If I added the sentence in the Abstract to the SotD, that would be a "unique sentence" describing why the document is being published, but why should I repeat the abstract? paul
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 20:55:10 UTC