- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:03:32 +0800
- To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:19:50AM -0600, Paul Grosso wrote: > > On 2012-12-11 03:31, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > >Did I only imagine suggesting we consider taking on life-after-REC > >responsibilities for XML Schema? As I understand it, the WG is not > >being rechartered, its current charter expires next month, and there > >are still bug reports coming in. . . > > > >Obviously we would have to recruit some Schema-aware new members. . . > > > > You had raised the issue at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Dec/0006 > and there have been no responses. > > I don't have strong feelings, so I'm waiting to hear what > others may have to say. Aie aie aie ... sorry to say this but XSD structure part is still the spec in the whole stack giving me headaches each time someone raises an issue about its semantic. But if we have the experts on-board, why not, though IMHO it is not "Core" to XML, but important for sure ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 08:04:08 UTC