- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:28:26 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, October 5, from 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka 15:30-16:00 UTC 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. Schedule of telcons ------------------- Our next telcon after this week is in two weeks on October 19. The telcon that would usually occur on November 2 is cancelled due to TPAC that week, so the following telcon will be November 16. TPAC week --------- TPAC will be 31 October through 4 November 2011 in Santa Clara California. http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ - Meeting Overview page. Registration is now open: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2011/ The XML Core WG will meet Thursday afternoon of the TPAC week. Likely attendance: Probably will: Paul, Norm, Henry, Liam Maybe: Mohamed Most likely won't: John, Daniel, Jirka, Glenn xml-stylesheet and HTML5 ------------------------ Henry started a thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Jul/0008 In the HTML5 spec, when dealing with the XML prolog, there is nothing about processing instructions, so it isn't clear that browsers would pick up the xml-stylesheet PI. John Cowan said there was another part of the spec that applies to that process, but Henry hasn't yet followed up on that. ACTION to Henry: Research to ensure that the xml-stylesheet PI is appropriately referenced from HTML5 and/or 3023bis (the XML media type definition). Note that 3023bis could say that browsers should reference Assoc SS and process the SSPI when processing an XML resource. Extending Xinclude ------------------ Norm sent email on behalf of DocBook at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Jul/0013 asking whether we want to consider extending Xinclude. The key issue is that xincluding content can often cause duplicate ids, and the question is whether we can define some kind of fix up. See http://docbook.org/docs/transclusion-requirements/#uc-5 for a use case. See http://www.docbook.org/docs/transclusion/#d6e180 for some DocBook proposals for id fixup. A processor might be able to find ids and/or idrefs if xml:id is used and/or there is a DTD/schema available, and even if that is the case, fixup would only work within the included module, but is that partial case worth augmenting XInclude. Liam suggests the only real solution is to do a transformation, so he doesn't feel there is an XInclude solution. Norm concluded it was not feasible to implement Jirka's proposals using xproc alone. ACTION to Norm: Try to implement Jirka's proposals using XSLT+XProc. XPointer and XPointer Registry ------------------------------ Norm asks whether http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/ should be updated to point to the XPointer Registry explicitly. 3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata We are creating an XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd (or perhaps 6th) Edition. ACTION to John: Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1 to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. On hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. 4. XML Test Suite. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. 6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri We had planned to issue the following spec editions referencing LEIRIs: * XML 1.0 6th Edition * XML 1.1 3rd Edition * XInclude 3rd Edition We continue to wait to see what might happen with IRIbis. 7. xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id 8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base 9. XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude We are creating an XInclude 3rd Edition. ACTION to Paul: Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. On hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. Norm sent email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Sep/0011 saying that the existence of RFC 5147 makes the constraint that @xpointer must not be present when parse="text" inappropriate. He suggests we remove that constraint. He also suggests that someone should register a text() XPointer scheme that implements RFC 5147. 11. Associating Stylesheets. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/ 12. xml-model See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas The Second Edition has been published as a WG Note at http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-xml-model-20110811/ paul [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Sep/0007
Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 15:29:27 UTC