- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:44:21 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Norm raised this issue, and we discussed it some at our f2f. This is my attempt to kick off an email discussion on the topic. Previous email discussion is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Oct/thread.ht ml#msg46 I would summarize the issue as follows: <issue-summary> There does (now) exist a fragment identifier syntax for text/plain, and it would be nice to be able to have an xinclude use that syntax to access part of a text file. Note that the current XInclude spec says that the xpointer attribute is ignored when parse="text". And even if that weren't the case, the fragment identifier syntax for text/plain wouldn't be an xpointer scheme. </issue-summary> We are chartered to issue an XInclude 1.0 3rd Edition which could perhaps include some clarifying text on this issue. We also have some interest in issuing an XInclude 1.1 which would allow us to add attributes to XInclude. At the f2f, we outlined three possible choices: 1. allow use of the @xpointer attribute when parse=text 2. add a new "@textptr" attribute to use when parse=text 3. add a new "@fragid" attribute to use in all cases and possibly deprecate the @xpointer attribute The assembled group at the f2f was generally positive about working on a solution of some sort. It felt like the "right" solution if we could time-travel backwards would be #3, the easiest spec change was to #2, though some of us felt that #1 was the best choice at the present. Either #2 or #3 would seem to require an XInclude 1.1. We might be able to get away with #1 in a 3rd Edition. Please discuss this in email. paul
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 17:45:12 UTC