- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:29:05 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, November 16, from 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka 15:30-16:00 UTC 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). The minutes from the TPAC f2f are at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Nov/0004 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. Schedule of telcons ------------------- We plan to have telcons on: Nov 30 Dec 14 Jan 11 No telcon on December 28. xml-stylesheet and HTML5 ------------------------ Henry and Paul met with Anne van Kesteren at the TPAC f2f (see minutes). Henry took an action to file a bug about xml-stylesheet handling. Done: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14689 HT: I have an *xhtml* doc with an xml-stylesheet PI with type=text/xsl. Does the HTML5 specs cover this case? ACTION to Henry: Consider asking the above question of the HTML5 WG after doing some research to determine what does currently happen. HT: Section 5.5.3 doesn't appear to distinguish between xhtml and non-xhtml xml documents. The spec does not make it obvious what should happen for non-xhtml xml documents. ACTION to Henry: Think about the above statement and determine if we need to file a bug report or ask a question about it. Extending XInclude ------------------ Henry, Paul, Liam, Murray discussed this at the f2f (see minutes). Those present generally liked the idea of extending xinclude to copy attributes on the xinclude element down to the root included element, but we didn't agree on details. Some issues include: 1. exactly what attributes to copy? Henry and Liam preferred to copy un-prefixed attributes (except those in the xinclude spec) too. 2. what to do about attribute conflict (error or one or the other wins). 3. whether we should "log" additions (e.g., via an attribute that says what attributes were added). 4. whether we should have some way for targets to say whether they can be xincluded and/or, when included, have attributes added. We had a discussion about xinclude being like img/@src rather than a/@href in that xincluding things is basically "stealing" them. We will continue this discussion in the WG. 3023-bis -------- Chris Lilley sent email that Paul forwarded at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Nov/0007 I'll be asking Henry what he makes of this. 3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata We are creating an XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd (or perhaps 6th) Edition. ACTION to John: Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1 to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. On hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. 4. XML Test Suite. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. 6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri We had planned to issue the following spec editions referencing LEIRIs: * XML 1.0 6th Edition * XML 1.1 3rd Edition * XInclude 3rd Edition We continue to wait to see what might happen with IRIbis. 7. xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id 8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base 9. XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude We are creating an XInclude 3rd Edition. ACTION to Paul: Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. On hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. XInclude @xpointer when parse="text" ------------------------------------ Henry, Paul, Liam, Murray discussed this at the f2f (see minutes). Previous email discussion at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Oct/thread.ht ml#msg46 We seem to have three choices: 1. allow use of the @xpointer attribute when parse=text 2. add a new "@textptr" attribute to use when parse=text 3. add a new "@fragid" attribute to use in all cases and possibly deprecate the @xpointer attribute The assembled group was generally positive about working on a solution of some sort. It felt like the "right" solution if we could time-travel backwards would be #3, the easiest spec change was to #2, though some of us felt that #1 was the best choice at the present. We will continue this discussion in the WG. 11. Associating Stylesheets. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/ 12. xml-model See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas The Second Edition has been published as a WG Note at http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-xml-model-20110811/ paul [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Oct/0025
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 17:29:58 UTC