- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:57:51 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh writes:
> "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> writes:
>> Did we ever say or imply that the productions in the spec
>> were non-ambiguous? Is the right response to these issues
>> simply that we never said the productions were non-ambiguous,
>> and if a parser writer wants or needs to translate them into
>> equivalent non-ambiguous versions, that's fine, but there is
>> nothing wrong with the productions in the spec?
>
> I think that's probably the right response.
+1
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 17:58:30 UTC