- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:41:18 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, June 1, from 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka 15:30-16:00 UTC 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. TPAC week --------- TPAC will be 31 October through 4 November 2011 in Santa Clara California. I think we should plan to have a f2f during this week: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ - Meeting Overview page. Likely attendance: Probably will: Paul, Norm, Henry, Liam Maybe: Mohamed Most likely won't: John, Daniel, Jirka, Glenn XML Security specs ------------------ The XML Security WG has asked the XML Core WG to review its upcoming specs as referenced below, especially: Canonical XML Version 2.0, http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/ XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0, http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-20/ Jirka did a review at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011May/0020 ACTION to Norm: Review the XML Security specs. 3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata We are creating an XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd (or perhaps 6th) Edition. ACTION to John: Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1 to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. 4. XML Test Suite. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. 6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri We had planned to issue the following spec editions referencing LEIRIs: * XML 1.0 6th Edition * XML 1.1 3rd Edition * XInclude 3rd Edition John wonders if we should call the next edition of XML 1.1 the 6th Edition to match the XML 1.0 spec. (No decision yet.) We decided not to touch XLink 1.0. XLink 1.1 is already leirified. John will update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1. Paul will update the Xinclude source. Paul, Norm, and Liam are responsible for dealing with pubrules and other administrivia. Our LEIRI WG Note says: When [IRIbis is published as an RFC], this specification will be re-issued to reference it in place of the extracts given below. We are concerned that the XML specs would be normatively referencing an RFC through a (non-normative) WG Note, so we're not sure what we want to do here. Furthermore, IRIBis is not moving to RFC quickly. So we're not sure what we should do about issuing new editions. Recent email from Larry Masinter (one of the authors of IRIbis) at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0022 doesn't give a time line for IRIBis at this point. ACTION to Henry: Ping Larry Masinter (one of the authors of IRIbis) for the latest on the IRIbis schedule. 7. xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id 8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base 9. XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude We are creating an XInclude 3rd Edition. ACTION to Paul: Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. 11. Associating Stylesheets. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/ ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata 12. xml-model See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas This has been published as a WG Note at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/ The ISO ballet has ended. Some of the comments led us to tweak our Note. Paul prepared an updated draft of the WG Note at http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm ACTION to John: Review the latest xml-model spec at http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm Jirka will present our disposition of comments to ISO and find out whether they need to do another ballot or not. ACTION to Jirka: Find out what the next steps will be for ISO's progression of the XML Model spec. We will wait until this telcon (June 1) to see what is the latest status with ISO and perhaps decide to publish a new edition of our WG Note then. paul [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011May/0002
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 22:42:01 UTC