- From: Michael Schäfer <michael.schaefer@destatis.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:56:13 -0400
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Dear Madam or Sir, I'm an employee of the Federal Statistical Office and member of a working group that developed an XML protocol for exchanging data between businesses and public administrations. A few days ago an implementor has come up with a question about the protocol's conformity with the XML specification, since the root element is named 'XMLTransport' and possibly considered a reserved name according to that specification. However, that element is defined in a namespace, so according to the XML Namespaces specification the local part of its name must conform to http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-xml-names-20091208/#NT-LocalPart which is equivalent to NCName at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-xml-names-20091208/#NT-NCName which refers back to Name at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Name in the XML specification, excluding the colon from the character space. Name defines syntax and character space for legal XML Names. The "rule" defining reserved names appears separately somewhat earlier in the same section. It's applicability seems to be restricted to the XML specification ("this specification"). Also, it is not a production. To me, it is unclear wether or not that rule applies to XML names defined in an XML namepace. I'd appreciate any clarification or helpful pointers on that subject. Thank you vermy much in advance, Michael Schäfer -- _____________________________________ Michael Schäfer C304 Werkzeuge und Standards Telefon +49 (0)611.753652 michael.schaefer@destatis.de www.destatis.de DESTATIS wissen.nutzen. | Statistisches Bundesamt
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2011 15:56:12 UTC