RE: [iri] #30: check leiri definition reference to iri syntax

Hi Martin,

That change seems fine to me, but I'll also check with the rest
of the XML Core WG.

thanks,

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Martin J. Dürst" [mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, 2011 March 10 1:53
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-iri@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [iri] #30: check leiri definition reference to iri syntax
> 
> Hello Paul,
> 
> Quite a while ago (sorry for the delay!), you requested a change in the
> LEIRI definition of the IRI spec (see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2008Mar/0000.html; this
> was tracked as
> http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/#leiri-relative-116 and later
> as http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/30). I have now
> implemented that change in my internal draft. This now says:
> 
>     This section defines Legacy Extended IRIs (LEIRIs).  The syntax of
>     Legacy Extended IRIs is the same as that for <IRI-reference>,
> except
>     that the ucschar production is replaced by the leiri-ucschar
>     production:
> 
> Please note that <IRI-reference> is not an XML start tag, but the way
> ABNF rule names are indicated in many Internet Drafts. An official
> draft
> with this change will appear at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-04 some time next
> Monday (March 14). Can you please check this change with the XML Core
> WG? I have already closed the issue, but we can reopen it anytime if
> needed.
> 
> Many thanks and regards,    Martin.
> 
> On 2011/03/10 15:01, iri issue tracker wrote:
> > #30: check leiri definition reference to iri syntax
> >
> > Changes (by duerst@…):
> >
> >    * status:  new =>  closed
> >    * resolution:  =>  fixed
> >
> >
> > Comment:
> >
> >   Copying in here from the original mail from Paul Grosso:
> >
> >   >>>>
> >   One could read section 7 to say that a LEIRI must match
> >   the production for IRI which would mean there could be
> >   no such thing as a relative LEIRI.  I'm quite sure we
> >   don't want this.
> >
> >   I think section 7 needs to say:
> >
> >    The syntax of Legacy Extended IRIs is the same as that
> >    for IRI-reference, except that ucschar is redefined....
> >
> >   since the production for IRI-reference is:
> >
> >     IRI-reference = IRI / irelative-ref
> >
> >   making IRI-reference the most inclusive one.
> >   >>>>
> >
> >   This change has been made by changeset
> >   http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/changeset/35 (and
> >   http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/changeset/36).
> >
> >   I'm going to check with Paul whether this is okay that way.
> >
> >   Regards,   Martin.
> >
> 
> --
> #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
> #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 14:15:50 UTC