Re: Last Call for XML Signature 2.0, Canonical XML 2.0 and XML Signature Streaming Profile of XPath 1.0

On 20.6.2011 19:00, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> Jirka and others,
> 
> The XML Sig WG wants to know if we accept their response to one
> of the comments we submitted.
> 
> I believe the crux is that Jirka questioned the need for another
> XPath subset.  The XML Sig WG:
> 
>> ... discussed the rationale for an additional profile at the 2010 TPAC
>> and Pratik has sent a message in response to this comment, see
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0013.html
> 
> So the question is whether we accept this response and, if not, what
> we want to suggest to resolve the issue.

Hi,

sorry for delay, I though that I have already responded to this.

I think that at this stage we accept their response, it has grounds.
Also they talked about this with some XSLT WG members on TPAC last year
(I wasn't there).

    Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------