- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:02:24 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be 2011 June 29. Status and open actions ======================= XML Signature review -------------------- Jirka did a review that we sent in. We are now being asked whether we accept one of the resolutions. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Jun/0008 TPAC week --------- TPAC will be 31 October through 4 November 2011 in Santa Clara California. We are planning to have a f2f during this week: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ - Meeting Overview page. Likely attendance: Probably will: Paul, Norm, Henry, Liam Maybe: Mohamed Most likely won't: John, Daniel, Jirka, Glenn LEIRIs and new editions ----------------------- Paul sent email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0007 asking for clarification of just we are planning to do in terms of issuing new editions wrt LEIRIs. Paul's latest assumption is that we would have the new editions point to our WG Note which already says: When [IRIbis is published as an RFC], this specification will be re-issued to reference it in place of the extracts given below. We are concerned that the XML specs would be normatively referencing an RFC through a (non-normative) WG Note, so we're not sure what we want to do here. There was some TAG email about IRIbis that Paul forwarded at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011May/0019 Henry plans to ask TAG about what XML Core should do in this situation. ACTION to Henry: Try to find out more about the status of IRIbis. XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd Edition ------------------------------------------- ACTION to John: Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1 to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. XInclude 3rd Edition -------------------- ACTION to Paul: Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. xml-model --------- The ballot has been approved. There were four comments which need to be addressed which means there will probably be another ISO vote. Some of the comments led us to tweak our Note. Paul prepared an updated draft of the WG Note at http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm The WG had CONSENSUS to publish XML Model 2nd Ed whose draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm ACTION to Paul: Publish XML Model 2nd Ed WG Note.
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 17:03:07 UTC