Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2011 June 1

Attendees
---------
Paul 
Norm
John 
Henry


[4 organizations (5 with proxies) present out of 9]

Regrets
-------
Liam
Jirka
Daniel


Absent organizations
--------------------
IBM
Innovimax
W3C (with regrets)
Jirka Kosek (with regrets)
Daniel Veillard (with regrets, proxy to the chair)


Our next telcon will be June 15.  Regrets from Liam.


> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
> 

Accepted.

> 
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
> 
> TPAC week
> ---------
> TPAC will be 31 October through 4 November 2011 in Santa Clara
> California.  I think we should plan to have a f2f during this
> week: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ - Meeting Overview page.
> 
> Likely attendance:
> 
> Probably will:  Paul, Norm, Henry, Liam
> Maybe:  Mohamed
> Most likely won't:  John, Daniel, Jirka, Glenn
> 
> 
> XML Security specs
> ------------------
> The XML Security WG has asked the XML Core WG to review its
> upcoming specs as referenced below, especially:
> 
> Canonical XML Version 2.0,
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/
> 
> XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0,
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-20/
> 
> Jirka did a review at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011May/0020
> 
> ACTION to Norm:  Review the XML Security specs.

ACTION to Norm continued.

Paul will communicate with Frederick.

> 
> 
> 3.  XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
> 
> We are creating an XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd (or
> perhaps 6th) Edition.
> 
> ACTION to John:  Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1
> to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference.
> 
> 
> 4.  XML Test Suite.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite
> issues raised by Frans Englich:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
> 
> 
> 5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
>    and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
> 
> 
> 6.  LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
> 
> We had planned to issue the following spec editions referencing
LEIRIs:
> 
> * XML 1.0 6th Edition
> * XML 1.1 3rd Edition
> * XInclude 3rd Edition
> 
> John wonders if we should call the next edition of XML 1.1
> the 6th Edition to match the XML 1.0 spec.  (No decision yet.)
> 
> We decided not to touch XLink 1.0.  XLink 1.1 is already leirified.
> 
> John will update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1.
> 
> Paul will update the Xinclude source.
> 
> Paul, Norm, and Liam are responsible for dealing with pubrules
> and other administrivia.
> 
> Our LEIRI WG Note says:
> 
>  When [IRIbis is published as an RFC], this specification will be
>  re-issued to reference it in place of the extracts given below.
> 
> We are concerned that the XML specs would be normatively referencing
> an RFC through a (non-normative) WG Note, so we're not sure what we
> want to do here.
> 
> Furthermore, IRIBis is not moving to RFC quickly.  So we're not
> sure what we should do about issuing new editions.
> 
> Recent email from Larry Masinter (one of the authors of IRIbis) at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0022
> doesn't give a time line for IRIBis at this point.
> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Ping Larry Masinter (one of the authors of
> IRIbis) for the latest on the IRIbis schedule.
> 

There was some TAG email about IRIbis that Paul forwarded at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011May/0019

Henry plans to ask TAG about what XML Core should do in this
situation.

> 
> 7.  xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id
> 
> 
> 8.  XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
> 
> 
> 9.  XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
> 
> 
> 10.  XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
> 
> We are creating an XInclude 3rd Edition.
> 
> ACTION to Paul:  Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect
> any errata and the LEIRI reference.
> 
> 
> 11.  Associating Stylesheets.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
> 
> AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/
> 
> ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at
> http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata

Henry had done this for last meeting, and this should not
have been included in this meetings agenda.  Action done,
item closed.


> 
> 
> 12.  xml-model
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas
> 
> This has been published as a WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/
> 
> The ISO ballet has ended.  Some of the comments led us to
> tweak our Note.
> 
> Paul prepared an updated draft of the WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm
> 
> ACTION to John:  Review the latest xml-model spec at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm
> 
> Jirka will present our disposition of comments to ISO and
> find out whether they need to do another ballot or not.
> 
> ACTION to Jirka:  Find out what the next steps will be
> for ISO's progression of the XML Model spec.
> 
> We will wait until this telcon (June 1) to see what
> is the latest status with ISO and perhaps decide to publish
> a new edition of our WG Note then.

The WG had CONSENSUS to publish XML Model 2nd Ed whose draft is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm


> 
> paul
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011May/0002
>

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 15:49:44 UTC