- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:46:12 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Glenn Paul Henry Jirka [? organizations (? with proxies) present out of 9] Regrets ------- Liam Norm Mohamed Daniel Absent organizations -------------------- Marklogics (with regrets) Innovimax (with regrets) W3C (with regrets) John Cowan Daniel Veillard (with regrets, proxy to the chair) Our next telcon will be August 10. > > Agenda > ====== > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > Accepted. > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > TPAC week > --------- > TPAC will be 31 October through 4 November 2011 in Santa Clara > California. I think we should plan to have a f2f during this > week: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ - Meeting Overview page. > > Registration is now open: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2011/ > The XML Core WG is meeting Thursday and Friday of the TPAC week. > > Likely attendance: > > Probably will: Paul, Norm, Henry, Liam > Maybe: Mohamed > Most likely won't: John, Daniel, Jirka, Glenn > > > Request for explanation of namespaces and attributes > ---------------------------------------------------- > An official request for an explanation of how namespaces affect > attributes an has been sent to xml-editor, archived at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2011JulSep/0000 > > Henry has already made a brief reply at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2011JulSep/0001 > and Bjoern Hoehrmann made a reply on www-tag at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jul/0007 > > We should work up an official reply. Since our next telcon isn't > for two weeks, I'd like to start that in email. > > ACTION to Paul: Come up with a draft explanation of namespaces > and attributes. ACTION to Paul, committed to getting this out before our next telcon. > > > xml-stylesheet and HTML5 > ------------------------ > Henry started a thread at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Jul/0008 > In the HTML5 spec, when dealing with the XML prolog, there is nothing about processing instructions, so it isn't clear that browsers would pick up the xml-stylesheet PI. John Cowan said there was another part of the spec that applies to that process, but Henry hasn't yet followed up on that. ACTION to Henry: Research to ensure that the xml-stylesheet PI is appropriately referenced from HTML5 and/or 3023bis (the XML media type definition). Note that 3023bis could say that browsers should reference Assoc SS and process the SSPI when processing an XML resource. > > 3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > > We are creating an XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd (or > perhaps 6th) Edition. > > ACTION to John: Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1 > to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference. > > On hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. > > > 4. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > > 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 > and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > > > 6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > We had planned to issue the following spec editions referencing LEIRIs: > > * XML 1.0 6th Edition > * XML 1.1 3rd Edition > * XInclude 3rd Edition > > We continue to wait to see what might happen with IRIbis. > > > 7. xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id > > > 8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > > > 9. XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > > > 10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > We are creating an XInclude 3rd Edition. > > ACTION to Paul: Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect > any errata and the LEIRI reference. > > On hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. > > > 11. Associating Stylesheets. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss > > AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/ > > > 12. xml-model > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas > > This has been published as a WG Note at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/ > > The ISO ballet has ended. Some of the comments led us to > tweak our Note. Jirka reports he doesn't expect to need another ballot, so this may soon become and ISO standard. > > Paul prepared an updated draft of the WG Note at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm > > The WG had CONSENSUS to publish XML Model 2nd Ed whose draft is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm > > ACTION to Paul: Publish XML Model 2nd Ed WG Note. > ACTION to Paul continued. > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Jul/0007 > > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 15:49:51 UTC