- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:03:31 +0100
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Cowan writes:
> My main concern is that the list of recommended profiles looks quite
> arbitrary: why these and no others? A further concern is with the
> term "recommended": recommended for what purpose? I would be happier
> if you just labeled them Profile I to Profile IV, or something of the
> sort. Detaching this from its context makes it seem as if Profile IV
> is exactly what the well-respected XML parser author ought to provide
> nowadays, and it's far from clear that that's true.
Speaking with my spec. editor hat on, please expand on your last
sentence. What _do_ you think the "well-respected XML parser author
ought to provide nowadays", and why?
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNptSDkjnJixAXWBoRAr0nAJ4hm4b3MxFnnZLa4nGgiy/VNxulBQCeMGfb
DjUoO7oI92JY6qp8CCrILyg=
=3zE7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 11:06:20 UTC