Re: [Fwd: [xml-model] Minor wording ambiguity]

Grosso, Paul wrote:

> Does that mean that a document conforming to this spec must not 
> contain such, or if it does contain such, they must be ignored
> by an xml-model processor and/or the application?

I think that former is the case. We want to prohibit <?xml-model from
other use then as xml-model processing instructions.

> I believe we want it to be a document conformance issue, in which
> case I suggest we reword it to say:
> 
>  Documents conforming to this specification *must not* contain
>  processing instruction information items with the [target]
>  property xml-model that are not xml-model processing instructions.
> 
> and I'm not sure if we need to say "conforming to this specification"
> at all, though I put it into my suggestion for clarity.

I like your proposal and I'm in favor of removing "conforming to this
specification" from it.

Thanks,

   Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------