- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:39:36 +0200
- To: "public-xml-core-wg@w3.org" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4D9DBE98.1010709@kosek.cz>
FYI -- I'm not sure if someone periodically checking xml-editor mailing
list.
I'm not native speaker, but to me this seems as a little bit exaggerated
-- although from grammar point of view Tony is right and there is
ambiguity, I don't think that there is any ambiguity in the
interpretation of the statement. Also I don't think that proposed change
of wording will lead to more digestible text.
Jirka
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [xml-model] Minor wording ambiguity
Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:03:11 +0000
Resent-From: xml-editor@w3.org
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:40:57 +0100 (IST)
From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
To: xml-editor@w3.org
In http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/ in the text:
Documents must not use processing instruction information items with the
[target] property xml-model if they are not xml-model processing
instructions.
the "they" could refer to either "documents" or "processing instruction
information items".
Up until I read "xml-model processing instructions", I thought "they" were
documents. I suggest changing this "they" to "the information items" in
any future edition.
Regards,
Tony Graham
Mentea.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 13:39:58 UTC