- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:34:22 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be 2010 June 2. Paul and Daniel send regrets; both give proxy to the chair; Norm will chair. Status and open actions ======================= LEIRI ----- See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Mar/0045 from Dan Connolly which references http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0037 At (among other places) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0001 Larry Masinter explains the plan, to wit: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-1.3 contains a definition in section 1.3 on "LEIRI proessing" which should in fact be a definition of LEIRI: LEIRI: This term was used in various XML specifications to refer to strings that, although not valid IRIs, were acceptable input to the processing rules in Section 7.1. where Section 7.1 of the same document is intended to contain an algorithm that will convert an LEIRI to an IRI. If that's adequate for XML Core to change its reference for LEIRI, fine, and if you need more, please say so. A direct reference to Section 7.1 is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-7.1 ACTION to Henry, Mohamed: Review the definition and discussion of LEIRIs in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00 and let the WG know if this would allow us to replace our LEIRI Note with a reference to this spec. Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss We are working toward a PER for AssocSS 2nd Edition. Our latest public draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/04/xml-stylesheet/ The transition request for AssocSS is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034 We had an unsuccessful transition call last week. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0057 The editors drafted new wording for Section 2 Conformance; see http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/ http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/diff.html Paul sent email to Daniel Glazman and TimBL requesting comment at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0012 If we haven't heard anything by end of this week (May 28), then: ACTION to Liam (as staff contact): Request that this latest draft at http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/ be accepted as the PER per the transition request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034 and that the PER review be published with appropriately adjusted dates (which the editors and staff contacts should determine).
Received on Monday, 24 May 2010 14:35:33 UTC