- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:30:58 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp@opera.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 2010 July 13 10:25 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; Grosso, Paul > Subject: Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2010 July 14 > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:54:19 +0200, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> > wrote: > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] > >> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 July 13 8:50 > >> To: Grosso, Paul > >> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > >> Subject: Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2010 July 14 > >> > >> I'll be late, sorry -- a conflict has arisen. > >> > >> I can implement explicit editing instructions wrt AssocSS if I'm > given > >> them, but I don't think the email to date is sufficiently > >> explicit. . . > > > > I agree--they are not, and the WG has not agreed to anything > > in particular in this regard yet. > > > > We'll plan to discuss this during the telcon if we have the > > necessary participants. > > Who are the necessary participants? If folks dial in that want to discuss it, we'll discuss it. If I raise the issue and all I get is silence, there won't be much of a discussion. Liam can't be there, but he has sent email explaining at least to some extent what he thinks we need to do to move forward. What I don't know is whether TimBL looked at the latest draft or if he just gave Liam comments based on his memory of our telcon--Liam? In any case, I won't task the editors to do anything to the spec until we have a WG consensus to do so, and I'm not sure we'll have enough people on this week's call to have consensus, but we can try to start a conversation. paul
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 15:32:45 UTC