- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:22:26 +0100
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:51:19 +0100, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > Issue taylor-1 (editorial, pending) > 4 low-level editorial points, [from paras 3, 5, 6 and 7] > Origin: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-stylesheet-comments/2009Dec/0003.html >> "Each PredefEntityRef in PseudoAttValue is replaced with with >> ..."s/with with/with/ >> >> "If it's not reported to the application" - s/it's/it is/ >> >> " [1] StyleSheetPI ::= "<?xml-stylesheet" (S PseudoAtts)? - (Char* "?>" >> Char*) "?>" " >> Should be: >> " [1] StyleSheetPI ::= "<?xml-stylesheet" ((S PseudoAtts)? - (Char* "?>" >> Char*)) "?>" " >> since the precedence of the XML EBNF '-' operator is undefined. >> >> "If specified, documents may use any string as the value." - seems like >> abuse of RFC2119 terminology. "X may do Y" means X can optionally choose >> to do Y or to not do Y, but it's impossible to choose not to use any >> string as the value if you specify the value. Maybe s/may/can/ (there's >> no need to use a conformance requirement keyword when you're not >> requiring anything). > Discussions: Agreed. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 18:23:01 UTC