- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:48:57 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
January 27, from
08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
16:00-17:00 UTC
16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.
Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
4. XML Test Suite.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
ACTION to Richard: Construct a test case for the XML test suite
issues raised by Frans Englich:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
ACTION to Henry: Add David Carlisle's comment at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2009Dec/0003
to our Namespace PE document.
6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
7. xml:id
The xml:id Recommendation is at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/
John Cowan submitted a proposed erratum at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jan/0009
At one point we thought we had Consensus:
The sentence "A document that uses xml:id attributes
that have a declared type other than xs:ID will always generate
xml:id errors" in Appendix D.3 should be deleted.
But they we reconsidered. Henry sent further email at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0048
We did agree that applying xml:id processing does not have
any impact on the DTD/XSD validity of the document.
John re-summarized his thoughts at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0008
ACTION to Henry (and others): Continue the xml:id issue
discussion in email.
---
Richard pointed out the following note in XML Base
(just before section 3.1):
This specification does not give the xml:base attribute
any special status as far as XML validity is concerned.
In a valid document the attribute must be declared in
the DTD, and similar considerations apply to other schema
languages.
and suggested a similar note should go into xml:id in D.1.
---
There was also some email about some typos for which we (Henry)
should process an editorial erratum:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0050
ACTION to Henry: Process an xml:id erratum to correct the typos; ref
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0050
8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
9. XLink 1.1.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
The earlier XLink CR was published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/
The XLink 1.1 LC was published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/
The LC review period ended 16 May 2008.
Norm has prepared an updated DoC at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/
Paul summarized the open issues at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0045
Norm replied at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0009
ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC accordingly.
The latest editor's draft (24 January 2010) is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview.html
Henry finds the DTD/RelaxNG/XSD fragments throughout the spec unhelpful
and would like to remove them (leaving them only in the appendices).
Henry specifically referenced the example immediately preceding 5.3.
But this was in the CR, so we will probably leave it, but we will
remove the default for xlink:type.
We plan to skip CR and going directly to PR.
Paul drafted a PR transition request at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0013
Norm created an updated IR at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html
ACTION to Norm: Adding a mention of the test suite at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests to the IR.
A diff between 1.0 and the latest PR ready draft is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview-diff.html
10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
11. Associating Stylesheets.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
Associating stylesheets with XML version 1.0 is at:
http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/
The Errata document is at:
http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata
We are working toward a PER for AssocSS 2nd Edition.
We have made our latest editor's draft at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2009/12/xml-stylesheet/
publicly available for review and announced it in various fora.
There are already some comments on the comments list at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-stylesheet-comments/2009Dec/
ACTION to Henry: Start an issues list for AssocSS.
12. xml-model
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas
Paul and Jirka (now an invited expert member of the XML Core WG)
are co-editors of a WG Note.
An updated (2010 Jan 13) internal editor's draft is available at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2010/01/xml-model/
Norm has sent in a few comments.
ACTION to others in the WG: Review and comment on the xml-model draft
at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2010/01/xml-model/
paul
[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jan/0007
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 15:54:07 UTC